This is some serious NPC shit. 🤦🏻♀️
This study looked at 1,000 people in New York City who’d been hospitalized for the coronavirus, and lo and behold, 66% were non-essential workers who were “staying at home”.
But “staying at home” does not entail hard quarantine. In the context of this study, all it means is not working outside the home
There is nothing to suggest that these people were infected at home. They could have easily gotten infected “by going out to get groceries or other essential items, or from seeing people outside of work” — and if they hadn’t, all that says is that they’d come in contact with someone who had. (Or with contaminated materials.)
Somebody had to get the supplies, and given NYC’s insanely high population density, that someone was most likely a member of their household — perhaps even someone who had been working outside the home.
BOTTOM LINE: People are NOT more likely to get infected by “staying at home”. The infected are more likely to be people who are not currently working outside the home because the vast majority of New Yorkers are not currently working outside the home.
Minimizing person-to-person transmission is not going to make a pandemic worse, and attempting to draw general conclusions about infection rates by looking at an already high-risk population (96% had underlying health conditions) is just atrocious methodology.
Tim Pool claimed the other day that 68% of millennial womxyzn are Democrats. This is incorrect.
PEW Research found in 2018 that 68% of 18-34 year olds identified as Democrats.
This 68% figure has been erroneously characterized by the media as representative of millennials, though anyone with a functioning front lobe who looks at the damn charts will no doubt realize millennials & zoomers have been grouped together.
The millennials’ share of that percentage almost certainly would have been higher, considering GenZ as a whole is more socially conservative than GenY. And it is likely to have climbed higher still in 2020, given the increasing political polarization of every cultural institution and the fact that womxyzn are more susceptible to emotional manipulation and ideological indoctrination.
Which brings me to my conclusion: that young womxyzn should be put on puberty blockers. Not long enough to sterilize them — just long enough to counteract the harmful effects of estrogen to the brain.
The Dems & MSM have claimed all along that Hunter Biden was never under investigation — he just happened to work for Burisma.
Shokin has maintained that Hunter WAS under investigation, but he was dismissed as having a conflict of interest (which is true) and smeared as having been fired for failing to tackle Burisma’s corruption (which is clearly false).
A news outlet in Ukraine and a Russian one both reported having seen documents substantiating Shokin’s claims, but they were dismissed in the Western media as “Russian propaganda”.
But now Giuliani has actual documents PROVING Biden’s son was actively being investigated for money laundering.
The Dems’ entire impeachment strategy rested on the idea that Trump was attempting to investigate the Bidens despite repeated assurances from those Obama holdovers the Dems paraded before us that there was zero cause to do so.
It also looks like they may have found where that “missing” $1.8 billion went.
(Re the idea that the institutions are the problem):
I don’t think it’s the institutions, I think it’s the people. It’s a combination of corruption and cowardice.
Take Congress. Many of them are corrupt, but for the most part it’s small-scale corruption that most people wouldn’t bat an eye at. But they refrain from calling out much greater levels of corruption because they know there would be retaliation. Even if they haven’t done anything particularly awful, the groundwork will have been set for their lives and the lives of their families to be torn apart, either by malicious investigations or trained media vultures or angry constituents — but probably all of the above.
The ones who aren’t corrupt know to keep their heads down and not rock the boat, because the moment they blow the whistle, the horde will descend upon them, and they’ll be subjected to much of the same (if not identical) treatment as the corruption-lite ones above.
And then there is the big-corrupt. For the reasons outlined above, they’re the safest. And the more power they manage to acquire — either by trading favors or selling contracts or diverting funds — the safer they become. They gain leverage over the people beneath them and use and discard them whenever necessary.
Whatever stories do mange to leak out — generally by the people over which they have oversight — are easily dismissed as wild smears or “conspiracy theories” (regardless of whether any conspiracy is actually implied), or else they get scooped up and embellished by people on the Internet to the point that they might as well feature big foot and bat boy and lizard people.
And then there are the truly evil people, like Adam Schiff. Though hardly anyone ever reaches the level of Schiff. He’s found ways to monetize, weaponize, and shield himself with the sensitive nature of the committee on which he sits and currently chairs. But I don’t want to get into Schiff right now except to say that the guy doesn’t have TDS — he is a full-blown sociopath. Highly intelligent and very dangerous.
Up to 94% of pre-pubescent “trans kids” will eventually cease identifying as the opposite sex. Pumping them full of puberty blockers & sex hormones is quite literally child abuse.
The physical and endocrinological changes will be for the most part irreversible. Boys will end up with micropenises and increased breast tissue, girls with excessive body hair and little to no breast tissue. Both will more than likely end up infertile.
Puberty blockers also retard neurological development and bone growth, resulting cognitive impairment, lower IQ, low bone density, and increased risk of fractures.
But by all means, keep abusing your children so you can virtue signal on social media about how goddamned “progressive” you are.
It was definitely about slavery. Not so much in existing states — at least not directly. What it boiled down to was whether future states admitted into the Union would be free or slave because they feared an imbalance would end up threatening the institution as a whole.
The South’s economy was slave based, so naturally that would have been their chief concern (just look at the post-war economic collapse), but culture definitely played a substantial role as well. The antebellum lifestyle was simply unsustainable after slavery had been abolished.
Where the question of self determination comes in is with regard to whether the states could legally secede, and even more to the point, whether the federal government had the authority to STOP them from leaving. And that’s a subject that continues to be debated to this day.
They’re not just “changing the definition of words” — they’re waging a war on the human mind itself by divorcing concepts from their referents. This is nothing less than epistemological terrorism.
They appropriate and intentionally misuse words until they enter common usage, and when called to account they’ll simply cite high-profile examples as “authoritative”.
Forget the gender crap for a moment — just look what they did with the word ‘literally’. Dictionaries are now being updated to claim that it means both itself and its negation. A is simultaneously “A” and “not A”.
Does that seem inconsequential? Well, imagine if they were to start doing this with words like ‘exploitation’, ‘equality’, ‘fascism’, and ‘racism’.
Oh, wait… 👀
People are being programmed to gleefully participate in their own lobotomies.