Friendly reminder to anything with a penis:
Without “affirmative consent,” it was rape. If you did “get her yes” only she now regrets having given it, it was rape.
Consent can be revoked if the sex didn’t go according to her expectations, or if she suffers from any form of mental illness (e.g., bipolar disorder) which she later determines to have affected her judgement.
That SHE was the one who put YOUR schroeder in her mouth has no bearing on whether or not you are a rapist.
And you most definitely are.
Hi, [Awesome Journalist Dude]. Fan here. There’s something I hope you will look into, because it helps explain a lot of false accusations and why sex assault is (supposedly) so underreported: What feminists actually mean when they talk about sexual assault.
A good place to start would be with ‘sexual violence’. It’s a catch-all term feminists employ because it allows them to make a lot of false equivocations.
Sexual violence can entail anything from a “verbal assault” (which includes catcalling) or sexual harassment (includes unwelcome flirtation) to rape — which isn’t necessary ‘rape’ in any conventional sense. Rather, ‘rape’ can refer to any sex act that fails to meet the feminist criteria for consent.
You’re probably aware of the term ‘affirmative consent’, but did you know that feminist ideology permits a woman’s ‘yes’ to be nullified AFTER the fact if she decides she didn’t really mean it?
Consent can also be revoked if the sex didn’t go according to her expectations, or if she suffers from any mental illness (e.g., bipolar disorder) and later concludes it had affected her judgement.
I was involved with radical feminism in my late teens, and nearly every girl I associated with had “attacker” stories to tell. And these she-roes were eager to tell everyone BUT the cops, complaining our laws simply weren’t strong enough to prosecute their “attackers”. In that much, they were correct.
All right, everyone — listen up, because an astonishing number of you don’t seem to understand the overwhelming support behind Brett Kavanaugh, or how the SCOTUS confirmation process even works.
The President can nominate whomever he damn well pleases, and it’s up to the Senate whether or not to confirm. There isn’t an ideological litmus test, and it doesn’t matter how “mainstream” a nominee is, because the Supreme Court does not exist to represent YOUR interests OR mine. The only “interests” it represents are those of the United States Constitution. (Worth noting: Brett Kavanaugh is an utter caricature of Middle America.)
The only relevant concern is whether the nominee is capable of doing the job.
Think he lacks the experience to fill a seat? Fine. Think he doesn’t understand the Constitution, or how to properly apply it? That’s fine too. Have concerns about the candidate’s ethics, or do you otherwise question whether he can and will remain objective in his rulings? Then certainly, Senator, you should vote ‘no’.
But please, all of you screaming your heads off about Roe v. Wade — shut the fuck up already. You don’t actually believe Trump can be pressured into nominating someone who supports abortion; you’re just looking for an excuse to bitch about Trump.
If you had any serious concerns about Kavanaugh’s confirmation, you belonged taking them to your senator — not taking to the streets like savages or whining about it on social media.
(To anyone who contacted their senator’s office and THEN whined: 👍 But I hope they had the good sense to ignore you unless you actually had something constructive to say.)
I’m tired of all the mischaracterizations of Kavanaugh supporters, and of people reframing the issues around irrelevant topics instead of challenging our arguments directly.
This was NEVER about abortion — not for us. It was never about politics — not for us — and if you think this was a right-wing movement, you’re living in an echo chamber.
Standing With Brett was never about wanting him confirmed. It was never about the Patriot Act, or about Donald Trump, or the myth of male privilege, and we aren’t the ones seeking to politicize sexual assault.
Standing With Brett boiled down to three things:
(1) Upholding the integrity of the judicial nomination process.
(2) A reaffirmation of due process.
(3) A rejection of the #metoo movement and its underlying feminist ideology.
No matter where any one of us happens to stand politically, THESE were the three things we held in common.
I posted this on Facebook last night, and I tagged my son’s paternal grandmother because she is full of feminist spite. She has been especially brutal on Kavanaugh.
So apparently feminists at the University of Washington created a site for women to anonymously doxx guys.
The police are refusing to do anything about it, but are instead encouraging men to drink less.
Who knows, guys? Maybe someday one of YOU could end up on a list just like this.
Feminism teaches us that unless a female gives affirmative consent while in a state of perfect sobriety, it’s “rape”.
(Affirmative consent = verbal affirmation of ‘yes’.)
And you know what, boys and girls? Feminism has taught me that I have NEVER ONCE engaged in consensual sex.
Not ever. 🤔
Some brave anon crunched the numbers: