Child Abuse for Woke Points

0

Up to 94% of pre-pubescent “trans kids” will eventually cease identifying as the opposite sex.  Pumping them full of puberty blockers & sex hormones is quite literally child abuse.

The physical and endocrinological changes will be for the most part irreversible.  Boys will end up with micropenises and increased breast tissue, girls with excessive body hair and little to no breast tissue.  Both will more than likely end up infertile.

Puberty blockers also retard neurological development and bone growth, resulting cognitive impairment, lower IQ, low bone density, and increased risk of fractures.

But by all means, keep abusing your children so you can virtue signal on social media about how goddamned “progressive” you are.

:^|

0

Whenever a person with particular ideological leanings commits a crime, that crime was ideologically motivated.

Unless they’re Muslim.

Similarly, whenever a cis white male commits mass murder, that CWM is a right-wing terrorist.

Regardless of his actual political leanings.

Yes, National Socialism is Socialism 🤦🏻‍♀️

0

Yes, National Socialism is REAL socialism.  It’s a political ideology.  The National Socialist German Workers’ Party was a political party founded by National Socialists, and under Hitler it would later adapt many of Mussolini’s economic policies.

The state controlled the means of production.  They simply employed certain measures allowing for the appearance of a market system, but instead of those “markets” being subject to market forces, they were controlled entirely by the government.

To put things in perspective: Under the New Economic Policy, the Soviets employed actual capitalistic measures.  Does that mean the Soviets were not socialists — or that the Soviet Union was “far right”? 🤔🤔🤔

Waves of Feminism

0

For the record:

The “1st” wave was the suffragettes.  Not so much an ideology as a movement.

2nd-wave feminism happened around the seventies.  Started off as a movement, but quickly became infiltrated by cultural Marxists.  Would later be used to rationalize much of the third-wave feminist nonsense.

3rd-wave (“radical”) feminism started off with the riot girl scene — female punk rockers with little to no talent or concept of propriety.  It would eventually make its way to the universities to merge with what second-wave feminism had become (Womyn’s Studies) and the growing push for diversity and multiculturalism.

4th-wave feminism is characterized by intersectionality.  (Because multiculturalism wasn’t “diverse” enough.)  This one originated squarely in the universities with the feminist appropriation of LGBT issues and the advent of modern “Gender Studies”.

(“Gender Studies” actually used to refer to the branch of Womyn’s Studies that dealt with male/female relations.  Back when there were still only TWO genders.)

[DISCORD] Philosophical Struggle

0

You can’t get through to the ones who are that far gone — the ones who don’t simply deny facts, but actually fail to see what’s right under their noses.

The ones we need to get through to are the ones on the fringes.  The ones who aren’t so fully gone that ideology is able to supersede reason.

And there are a lot of people who have remained willfully ignorant, simply because they despise the churlishness that often accompanies political arguments.  We need to reach them too, because they need to realize that what’s ultimately going on here isn’t a political struggle but an philosophical one.

Are we going to let racism and brutality dictate our future?  Are we going to discard science and medicine because we’re afraid of hurting people’s feelings?  Is truth whatever each of us chooses it to be, or do we live in an objective reality?

Politics comes second to all that.

[DISCORD] Reactive & Regressive

0

The Regressive Left is inherently reactive.  That’s what ultimately sets them apart from actual left-wing progressives like Tim Pool, Lucas Lynch, and Sargon.  The left has been sucked dry of independent thought, and they aren’t able to come up with any new ideas now that their progressive handlers have immersed themselves in identity politics and intersectional ideology.

And no, I don’t believe that the Democratic leadership subscribes to an iota of what they preach.  People like Hillary and Obama are tacticians — not NPCs — and labeling them as such isn’t productive in the least.

The Dems are sitting on a powder keg, playing with matches.  The blue checkmarks, the #resisters, the Democratic Socialists — you know, the actual NPCs — they have been so thoroughly indoctrinated that they are just as likely to turn and bite any of their handlers for deviating from the social programming as they are the people they’ve been conditioned to hate.

And that’s what we’re seeing now, whenever these young “Justice Democrats” (AOC, Omar, Tlaib) openly criticize — even threaten — senior Dems.  When popular opposition to Nancy Pelosi reaches the point that her own people have to consider removing her.  When the blue check marks and their followers begin to turn on the Democratic leadership, claiming (even now) that they are either too centrist or not radical enough.

And I think the Dems are finally starting to realize what they’ve unleashed.  Have you seen Nancy Pelosi?  She looks terrible.  I imagine she must be an anxious mess, trying to simultaneously appease the traditional Democratic voter bloc and deal with Trump, all while fully aware that there are people within her own party — and a ravenous horde at its outskirts — that would like nothing more than to tear her to pieces.

It’s almost enough to make me feel sorry for her.